Measure
Professional-grade readings of magnetic fields, electric fields, radiofrequency and dirty electricity in the rooms that matter to you.
EMF RESEARCH, FOR YOUR HOME
A plain-language map of the published research, and how to use it when you want to fine-tune your own home.
You probably think about the air you breathe, the water you drink and the light you sleep under. Your home has one more layer that rarely gets the same attention: the wiring, wireless devices and utility equipment that fill every room with electric, magnetic and radiofrequency fields. You can't see it, and most people never look.
If you like to understand how your home actually works, and make it work a little better, the published research is a sensible place to start. It is also enormous, technical and easy to misread, which is what this page is for.
Most people who go looking for answers end up in one of three places, and each leaves a real gap.
Each instinct is reasonable. None of them tells you what is in your own rooms.
This page summarizes a public database of published EMF research, kept by an independent non-profit, ORSAA (the Oceania Radiofrequency Scientific Advisory Association). It holds 2,609 studies that report at least one biological effect from electromagnetic fields, sorted into 46 effect categories. Snapshot last refreshed 2026-09-13.
Five things to keep in mind as you read it, or browse every study in the EMF studies database:
Each tile below is one type of biological effect that researchers have reported after exposing cells, animals or people to electromagnetic fields, such as oxidative stress, altered gene expression or changes in sleep. The number is how many studies in the research database reported that effect. The colour is the database's own label for how the effect relates to disease.
The biggest categories are Altered Enzyme Activity / Protein Levels / Protein Damage (796), Biochemical Changes (782) and Oxidative Stress / ROS / Free Radicals (598). These are mostly things measured in cells and tissue in a lab. The three categories the database labels as a known disease (Brain Tumours, Breast Cancer and Autism / ADHD / Hyper-Activity) have between 11 and 72 studies each. A large number means many studies reported that effect. It does not mean the effect is likely at the exposure levels found in a home.
Each study is marked with the database's own finding. About 95% of listings say "Effect"; the rest are marked "Uncertain Effect", "No Effect" or similar. New to this? Select any tile to open that category in the EMF studies database and see what the individual papers tested.
Neither the colours nor the counts rank risk in a home.
The studies above describe exposures in cells, animals and people under many different conditions. Your home has its own: one electrical service, one set of wiring, one mix of devices in particular rooms. Fine-tuning it starts with knowing what is actually there. An assessment measures four things:
The method is deliberately short.
Mitch Marchand, B.Sc. EE, has been measuring homes since 2011: more than 1,000 assessments across 5 countries, and a Certified Building Biology Electromagnetic Radiation Specialist. Riun Ashlie runs most of the day-to-day work today, with more than 10 years of hands-on EMF measurement and mitigation experience of his own.
Want to explore on your own first? Try the free light flicker tool, the FCC ID lookup or the EMF unit converter.
Readings are taken in the rooms you actually use, bedrooms first in most homes, and explained on site as they are taken.
Professional-grade readings of magnetic fields, electric fields, radiofrequency and dirty electricity in the rooms that matter to you.
Findings are explained in plain language as they are taken, not mailed to you as a report full of numbers with no context.
Most homes have two or three findings worth acting on and a long list that isn't. You leave with a short, prioritized answer.
In person in Calgary and Edmonton, or as a remote consult anywhere using a meter kit and a shared screen.
The aim isn't a home with zero exposure. Nobody can promise that, and anyone who does shouldn't be trusted. The aim is a home you understand: which fields are present, where they come from, which are worth changing and which are simply part of living with modern electricity and technology.
Usually the useful changes are small: moving a device, fixing a wiring fault, adjusting a setting. That replaces a vague, ongoing question with a specific answer: this matters, this doesn't, and here is a reasonable next step.
No. A count is how many studies in the database reported that effect. It is not a measure of risk, dose or likelihood of harm in a home. Only measurements in your own rooms can tell you what your exposure actually is.
No. They are studies that reported a biological effect. Designs and exposure conditions vary widely, a biological effect is not automatically a health effect, and the database cannot show studies that found nothing. Treat it as a map of what has been reported, and follow the links to the original papers.
Almost nobody does. The useful questions are which devices matter, where they sit and when they run, not whether to have them at all.
Yes. The light flicker tool, FCC ID lookup and EMF unit converter are free. They help you understand your devices, but they cannot replace measuring the rooms themselves.
No. That is a medical question, and it isn't ours to answer. An assessment gives you measured exposure levels, their likely sources and practical options. What you do with that is between you and your practitioner.